Can Disturbing Graphics Scare People Off of Cigarettes?—Brainstorm Health

Source: fortune
So, the point seems to be that these graphics and warnings can be effective—depending on how they’re deployed. “While most people assume the public knows all they need to understand about the harms of cigarette smoking, there’s a surprising number of lesser-known risks that both youth and adult smokers and nonsmokers may simply not be aware of,” said acting FDA commissioner Ned Sharpless in a statement. “Taken as a whole, the research on pictorial warnings show that they are: (i) more likely to be noticed than text-only warning labels; (ii) more effective for educating smokers about the health risks of smoking and for increasing smokers’ thoughts about the health risks; and (iii) associated with increased motivation to quit smoking,” writes the agency. And, to date, the most effective anti-smoking efforts appear to stem from vice taxes and indoor smoking bans. The World Health Organization (WHO) has a few nuanced points to make on that vary issue. Sy Mukherjee, @the_sy_guy, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is going down a familiar path in its anti-smoking efforts—one that has been embraced by plenty of nations abroad. The idea? Read on for the day’s news. Good afternoon, readers. The point of the shock and awe tactics—which would also considerably increase the size of the warnings—is two-fold: Gross people out while also informing them. Slap graphic warning labels onto cigarette packs in an effort to discourage use. If you’ve ever been to a corner store in Europe or other continents, you’ve probably encountered the gruesome packaging that goes onto packs of cigarettes. They can include graphic depictions of lungs decimated by smoke, or of people who have to harness breathing tubes because of their long-term cigarette use. But there’s another question… Just how effective are these warnings?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *